help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

First published online on February 23, 2007
Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2006-0049
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
28/3/284    most recent
Final Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xian, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xian, C. J.
Endocrine Reviews 28 (3): 284-296
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Roles of Epidermal Growth Factor Family in the Regulation of Postnatal Somatic Growth

Cory J. Xian

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, North Adelaide 5006, Australia; and Disciplines of Paediatrics and Physiology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia

Correspondence: Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: A/Prof. Cory J. Xian, Ph.D., Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia. E-mail: cory.xian{at}adelaide.edu.au


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
Ligands of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), known to be important for supporting tissue development particularly in the gut and brain, have also been implicated in regulating postnatal somatic growth. Although optimal levels of both milk-borne and endogenous EGF-R ligands are important for supporting postnatal somatic growth through regulating gastrointestinal growth and maturation, supraphysiological levels of EGF-R ligands can cause retarded and disproportionate growth and alter body composition because they can increase growth of epithelial tissues but decrease masses of muscle, fat, and bone. Apart from their indirect roles in influencing growth, possibly via regulating levels of IGF-I and IGF binding proteins, EGF-R ligands can regulate bone growth and modeling directly because they can enhance proliferation but suppress maturation of growth plate chondrocytes (for building a calcified cartilage scaffold for bone deposition), stimulate proliferation but inhibit differentiation of osteoblasts (for depositing bone matrix), and promote formation and function of osteoclasts (for resorption of calcified cartilage or bone). In addition, EGF-like ligands, particularly amphiregulin, can be strongly regulated by PTH, an important regulatory factor in bone modeling and remodeling. Finally, EGF-R ligands can regulate bone homeostasis by regulating a pool of progenitor cells in the bone marrow through promoting proliferation but suppressing differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

I. Introduction
II. EGF Family of Growth Factors and Receptors
A. EGF family of growth factors
B. ErbB receptors and signal transduction pathways

III. Roles of EGF Family Ligands in Regulating Postnatal Growth and Body Composition
A. Roles in regulating maternal milk supply for neonate growth
B. Roles in regulating neonate gut development and somatic growth
C. Supraphysiological levels of EGF-R ligands and postnatal growth retardation
D. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating body composition

IV. Roles of EGF Family Ligands in Regulating Postnatal Bone Growth and Modeling
A. Mechanisms of children’s bone growth and modeling
B. Regulation of bone growth and modeling
C. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating development of ossification centers
D. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating chondrocyte proliferation and maturation
E. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating osteoblast proliferation and maturation
F. Regulation of EGF-R ligand production by PTH
G. Roles of EGF family ligands in regulating osteoclast formation and bone modeling

V. Roles of EGF-R Ligands in Regulating Levels of Growth Modulators IGF-I and IGFBP-3
VI. Roles of EGF-R Ligands in Biology of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
VII.
Concluding Remarks


    I. Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
IT HAS BEEN CLEAR since the early and mid 1990s that the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of growth factors is important in regulating growth, maturation, function, and maintenance in epithelial tissues (particularly the mammary gland and gastrointestinal tract) and the nerve system. However, roles of this family of growth factors in regulating somatic growth, particularly skeletal tissue growth, have been less clear. In the last few years, several studies have appeared that have demonstrated some important functions of EGF and EGF-like ligands in regulating bone growth and modeling. This review has provided a summary of studies reported in the last two decades focusing on physiological roles of the EGF family of growth factors and their possible indirect and direct ways in regulating postnatal somatic growth, body composition, bone growth, modeling, and maintenance.


    II. EGF Family of Growth Factors and Receptors
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
A. EGF family of growth factors
The EGF family comprises six known structurally related polypeptides, namely EGF, TGF-{alpha}, amphiregulin (AR), heparin-binding EGF (HB-EGF), betacellulin (BTC), and epiregulin (EPR). This family of growth factors is distinguished by the fact that their soluble forms are proteolytically derived from their integral membrane precursors and that they all contain a conserved three-loop compact structure, known as the EGF-like domain (1). These growth factors, produced by various cell types such as the mammary gland and gut epithelial cells and cells in the nerve system, have been implicated in growth, differentiation, maintenance, and repair of various tissues (2). Related to the EGF family of growth factors is another subfamily of growth factors collectively termed neuregulins, which will not be included in this review because they function mainly in regulating proliferation and cell fate determination of pluripotent neural crest cells and to be survival and/or differentiation factors for Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes in the nerve system (3, 4, 5, 6).

B. ErbB receptors and signal transduction pathways
The EGF family ligands all bind and activate the common tyrosine kinase receptor, EGF receptor (EGF-R or ErbB1) (7), which is a transmembrane glycoprotein with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity (8). Once bound by a ligand, EGF-R functions as a part of a network, forming heterodimers with one of the three related proteins, ErbB2/c-neu, ErbB3, and ErbB4. The ErbB receptors are activated by binding the ligands of the EGF family or the neuregulin family and can signal through homodimerization or through heterodimerization with other ErbB molecules. Although all of the six EGF-R ligands bind EGF-R, three of them (EGF, TGF-{alpha}, and AR) only bind EGF-R, and three of them (HB-EGF, BTC, and EPR) also directly bind ErbB4 (Fig. 1Go) (7, 9, 10, 11). Neuregulins bind directly to the receptors ErbB3 and/or ErbB4 (4). The bound homo- or heterodimerized ErbB receptors undergo auto- or trans-phosphorylation on specific tyrosine residues in their intracellular tails, resulting in subsequent initiation of multiple intracellular signaling pathways, including the Ras-Raf-MAPK pathway and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway (10, 12, 13).


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 1. Complexity of ligand-receptor interactions between EGF and neuregulin (NRG) families of ligands and ErbB receptors.

 
Activation of ErbB receptors plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival in different tissues, and thus in maintaining homeostasis and regulating injury responses in various tissues including the mammary gland (1, 14), the nerve system (15, 16), and the gastrointestinal tract (1, 17, 18, 19, 20). Although there are excellent reviews on different aspects of these physiological roles (1, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18), roles of the EGF family of growth factors in regulating somatic growth, particularly skeletal tissue development and maintenance, are less clear.


    III. Roles of EGF Family Ligands in Regulating Postnatal Growth and Body Composition
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
A. Roles in regulating maternal milk supply for neonate growth
Evidence has suggested that EGF-R ligands can regulate postnatal development and growth indirectly by influencing the supply of maternal milk, which is the only complete source of nutrients for neonatal development and growth (21). Genetic studies or studies on ligand expression and receptor activation have revealed that EGF-R signaling is required in normal growth, ductal morphogenesis, and homeostasis of the mammary gland, and may play a role in regulating lactation (22, 23, 24, 25). Mutant mice with genetic knockout of three EGF-R ligands (AR, TGF-{alpha}, and EGF) showed an aggravated defect in lobuloalveolar development and lactation, revealing poorly organized and differentiated alveoli and lowered milk protein gene expression in the triple null glands (23, 25). Consistent with the observation of the possible supporting roles for EGF and TGF-{alpha} in lactogenesis (23), it has been shown that TGF-{alpha} can support the capacity of mammary ductal epithelium to proliferate and differentiate in the absence of estrogenic stimuli (26). Treatment with TGF-{alpha} of the virgin mammary glands from estrogen receptor-{alpha} knockout mice stimulated ducts to undergo localized branching, growth, and secretory differentiation as evidenced by the production of milk proteins casein and whey acidic protein (26). Furthermore, suggesting possible roles of EGF-like ligands and ErbB receptors in lactation, ErbB2 and sialomucin complex/MUC4 (a membrane mucin and an intracellular ligand for ErbB2) (27) have differential expression patterns in the developing rat mammary glands, but both are maximally expressed during late pregnancy and lactation (28).

In addition, studies have also suggested that endocrine-derived EGF may also contribute to the mammary gland development and lactation. EGF mRNA is found highly expressed in the salivary gland, and the salivary gland serves as a major source of circulating EGF (29). Consistently, sialoadenectomy lowered concentration of circulating EGF (30) and affected mammary development and the capacity of the lactating mothers to nurse pups (31, 32). Sialoadenectomy induced a lower production of casein in response to lactogenic stimuli during pregnancy and caused reductions in size and in milk production of lactating mammary glands, all of which could be rescued when EGF was injected daily into sialoadenectomized pregnant mice (31, 32). These studies suggested that the submandibular salivary gland contributes to the regulation of mammary gland developmental via secretion of EGF, and that EGF family of growth factors is important for the optimal quality and quantity of milk, which is critical for ensuring optimal postnatal growth of neonates.

B. Roles in regulating neonate gut development and somatic growth
Genetic studies showed that EGF-R and its ligands are important for optimal growth. Depending on the genetic background of mice used, mutants with EGF-R knockout had either embryonic lethality or severe growth retardation (50–70%) in neonates, suggesting that the EGF-R is important for somatic growth (33, 34, 35). Similarly, homozygous mice with a conditional knock-in of human EGF-R (replacing mouse endogenous EGF-R and thus resulting in a reduced EGF-R signaling) showed growth retardation (35). Although knockout of TGF-{alpha}, EGF, or BTC alone affected postnatal growth only slightly (23, 36, 37), probably due to redundancy and compensation mechanism by other EGF-R ligands, triple null mice lacking TGF-{alpha}, EGF, and AR simultaneously showed significantly impaired postnatal growth of the pups (23, 38). The triple null mutants had a 40% reduction in body weight compared with the wild-type littermates by 3 wk of age (23, 38). Furthermore, cross-fostering experiments have revealed that growth factors from maternal milk and from the neonate endogenous sources were important for postnatal growth (38). Body weights of triple null mice were only partially restored when these pups were nursed by wild-type dams; conversely, wild-type pups fed triple null milk had reduced body weights, relative to the wild-type control pups. In addition, growth of triple hemizygous pups born to triple null homozygous dams was retarded (38). Thus, optimal postnatal growth requires both maternal and neonatal sources of EGF-R ligands, and loss of either is deleterious to postnatal growth.

It is possible that the majority of the effects on somatic growth seen in EGF-R null or ligand triple null mice could, as shown in these studies, be due to the multiple organ maldevelopment. Importantly, optimal growth, development, and functional maturation of the gastrointestinal tract are vital for nutritional supply for optimal postnatal growth. It is now clear that EGF-R ligands of both maternal and endogenous sources are critical for supporting the gut growth and development, and the impaired postnatal growth of the above triple null mice or wild-type pups nursed by triple null dams was mostly contributed by impairment of gut development in these young mice (38). Due to the high concentrations of milk-borne growth factors including the EGF family in the colostrums and expression of endogenous EGF-like peptides and EGF-R in the gut tissue, the milk-borne and endogenous EGF-R ligands have been demonstrated to contribute to neonatal intestinal growth and functional development in the early postnatal period (17, 18, 38).

Therefore, the above studies suggest that EGF-R ligands from both maternal and neonatal sources are important for optimal postnatal growth, and that these growth factors can regulate postnatal growth both indirectly by influencing maternal milk supply and by supporting neonate gastrointestinal development and maturation and directly because EGF-R signaling deficiency causes somatic growth retardation.

C. Supraphysiological levels of EGF-R ligands and postnatal growth retardation
On the other hand, pharmacological or transgenic studies have demonstrated that supraphysiological levels of EGF-R ligands have negative effects on somatic growth. Systemic treatment with EGF in neonatal rats caused growth retardation (39, 40). Similarly, an early genetic study has observed that mice overexpressing TGF-{alpha} had significant decreases in the size of body and skeleton and their weight was approximately 90% of the weight of control mice (41). Consistently, EGF overexpressing mice showed retarded somatic and bone growth (42). The weights of these mice were about 78% of the body weights of nontransgenic littermates by adulthood. Similarly, HB-EGF overexpression exhibited a 20% decrease in body weight before 6 wk of age in the mutants compared with wild-type littermates (43), and mice overexpressing BTC ubiquitously exhibited disproportionate growth with reduced body weight gain and impaired longitudinal growth with reduced dimensions of long bones (37). Interestingly, all these transgenic studies demonstrated retarded bone growth, suggesting that EGF family ligands negatively regulate postnatal bone growth.

D. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating body composition
It is known that gonadal sex steroids and GH/IGF-I are the two main determinants of evolving body composition in infancy, childhood, puberty, and adulthood, because signals from the gonadotropic and somatotropic axes singly and jointly govern accrual and depletion of muscle, fat, and bone mass across a lifetime (44). Several pharmacological and genetic studies have shown that EGF-R ligands can also modify body composition. In newborn rats, systemic administration of EGF for 10 d dose-dependently resulted in body weight loss and a decrease in fat pad weight, although it did not alter or slightly increased the weights of other organs, such as liver and intestine (45). In adult rats, systemic infusion of recombinant rat BTC stimulated growth of intestine by enlarging crypt epithelial area, but it reduced body weight and food intake and caused a diuretic condition characterized by a reduced serum insulin concentration, increased water intake and urine output, suggesting that BTC stimulates gastrointestinal growth and regulates fluid homeostasis (46). In an early study, mice overexpressing TGF-{alpha} had a disproportionate reduction in carcass weight but an increase in weights of several epithelial organs, resulting in induction of epithelial hyperplasia, pancreatic metaplasia, and mammary carcinoma (47). Consistently, changes in organs and tissues have also been observed in BTC transgenic mice, which exhibited a disproportionately decreased pancreas weight and a significant and disproportionate reduction in absolute and relative carcass weight (comprising a large proportion of total body weight, composed of muscle, bone, fat, and connective tissue) (37).

In mice overexpressing TGF-{alpha}, a significant reduction in muscle weight has also been observed, with the distal hindlimb muscle weights being 20% below normal and other skeletal muscles being visibly smaller in size, which was associated with decreases in the number and area of striated muscle fibers (47). Consistently, administration of EGF peptide enhanced mRNA expression in skeletal muscle of mitochondrial uncoupling protein UCP3, a protein thought to uncouple the respiratory chain and thus to increase energy expenditure (48), suggesting that EGF-like peptides can influence skeletal muscle growth and metabolism.

The ability of EGF-R ligands to retard adipose tissue development in vivo has been relatively well characterized. Adipose tissue growth occurs by both hyperplasia and hypertrophy. Because EGF-R has been detected in normal adipose tissue (47), EGF-R ligands may have physiological roles in regulating adipocyte differentiation, adipogenesis, and fat mass. Consistently, administration of EGF to newborn rats for 10 d resulted in decreased fat pad weight in a dose-dependent fashion (45), and mice overexpressing TGF-{alpha} had significantly reduced fat contents, with weights of epididymal fat pads decreased by 40–80% and total body fat by 50% compared with control (47). From previous studies, several mechanisms could account for effects of EGF-R ligands in fat content. Firstly, EGF-like ligands suppress adipocyte differentiation and maturation. Although the number of adipocyte precursors in inguinal fat pads of EGF-treated animals was higher, the number of mature adipocytes and the amount of triglyceride accumulated per fat pad were concomitantly lower, and adipocyte precursors isolated from EGF-treated animals displayed reduced differentiation ability in culture compared with normal controls (45). Consistently, reductions in fat weights in TGF-{alpha} transgenic mice were found associated with decreases in the cellularity of fat pads, and TGF-{alpha} dose-dependently suppressed adipocyte differentiation of precursor cell line 3T3-F442A and diminished mRNA expression of adipocyte-specific markers adipsin and glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (47). Secondly, EGF-R ligands may induce lipolysis and enhance metabolism in fat tissue. Systemic EGF treatment in rats was shown to reduce amounts of adipose tissue through up-regulation of lipase level and activity and thus induction of lipolysis (49). Furthermore, EGF treatment in vivo was demonstrated to enhance mRNA expression in adipose tissue of mitochondrial uncoupling protein UCP3, a protein thought to uncouple the respiratory chain and thus to increase energy expenditure (48). Therefore, the above studies suggest that EGF-R ligands, apart from being strong stimulators for epithelial tissue growth, reduce body and carcass weights and decrease muscle and fat mass.


    IV. Roles of EGF Family Ligands in Regulating Postnatal Bone Growth and Modeling
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
A. Mechanisms of children’s bone growth and modeling
Growth of the skeletal system is the major component or driver for the postnatal somatic growth and development. During childhood and adolescence, bone lengthening and acquisition of peak bone mass and its trabecular organization are achieved mainly through the process called endochondral ossification, involving production of calcified cartilage and its conversion and modeling into trabecular bone. The growth plate cartilage, located at the ends of children’s long bones (Fig. 2AGo), is responsible for the production of the intermediate cartilaginous template through chondrocyte activation, proliferation, maturation, hypertrophy, synthesis of cartilage matrix, its calcification and vascularization (Fig. 2BGo) (50, 51). Conversion of calcified hypertrophic cartilage into primary trabecular bone with partially modeled cores of calcified cartilage occurs at the adjacent metaphyseal primary spongiosa region (Fig. 2BGo), which involves bone-forming cells (osteoblasts) lining and synthesizing new bone matrix on trabecular surface and resorptive cells (osteoclasts and chondroclasts) binding to the surface of calcified tissues and secreting acid and proteolytic enzymes to undergo resorption and modeling of calcified cartilage or bone (Fig. 2CGo) (50, 51). Through coordinated action of osteoclasts and osteoblasts, the bony trabeculae in the primary spongiosa (greater in number but thinner in size) are further modeled into the more mature and mechanically sound bone trabeculae (thicker in size but smaller in number) located in the secondary spongiosa of the metaphyseal bone (Fig. 2BGo) (52).


Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 2. Structure and function of growth plate cartilage and metaphyseal bone in bone lengthening and bone mass accumulation. Growth plate, situated at the ends of a long bone (A), is composed of the resting, proliferative, and hypertrophic zones (B). Through sequential activation, proliferation, maturation, hypertrophy, and apoptosis of chondrocytes, the growth plate produces a calcified template for new bone deposition in metaphysis (B). Calcified cartilage is first modeled to primary trabecular bone at the metaphysis, which is further modeled into more mature secondary spongiosa trabecular bone (B). This modeling is carried out by coordinated action of these two cell types (C): osteoclasts (block arrows) that resorb the mineralized cartilage or bone, and osteoblasts (small arrows) that synthesize bone-matrix on trabecular bone surface. Images, taken from 8-wk-old male rats, were from the author’s unpublished work. A, x-ray film; B, upper panel, alcin blue hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (magnification, x100); lower panel, H&E staining (magnification, x25); C, H&E staining (magnification, x400).

 
B. Regulation of bone growth and modeling
Longitudinal bone growth occurs at a higher rate during the first year of life and during pubertal growth spurt, but at a more modest rate during the decade of life between these two periods (53). The process of endochondral bone formation is tightly regulated by endocrine/paracrine/autocrine factors such as hormones, vitamins, transcriptional factors, and growth factors, and involves coordinated and sequential expression of regulatory factors (54). Many factors have now been shown to have important roles in regulating various processes of the endochondral ossification and modeling, including hormones (such as GH, thyroid hormone, sex hormones, glucocorticoids, calcitonin); vitamins (vitamin D3, ascorbate, retinoic acid); morphogens such as Indian hedgehog; growth factors such as IGF-I, TGF-ß, bone morphogenic proteins, fibroblast growth factors, PTHrP, platelet-derived growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor; and cytokines such as TNF-{alpha} and IL-1 (52, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62). Roles of many regulatory factors (such as GH/IGF-I, bone morphogenic proteins/TGF-ß, fibroblast growth factors, PTHrP/Indian hedgehog, vascular endothelial growth factor, and Wnt families) and some transcriptional factors (such as Sox9 and Runx2) in bone growth and modeling are quite clear or well characterized (51, 61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73). However, expression, roles, and action mechanisms of the EGF family of growth factors in bone growth regulation are less clearly delineated.

C. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating development of ossification centers
EGF-R ligands may play a role by negatively regulating development of ossification centers and limbs. EGF-R is expressed in chondroblasts of the developing ossification centers, and TGF-{alpha} treatment inhibited cartilage nodule formation from mesenchymal cells derived from rat mandibles and from rat embryonic limb bud, suggesting a role of TGF-{alpha} in inhibiting chondrogenesis during embryonic development (74). During limb development, epithelial cells in the apical ectodermal ridge keep the underlying mesenchymal cells in a proliferative state, preventing their differentiation possibly by secreting signaling molecules including TGF-{alpha} and EGF (75, 76). Consistently, in vitro studies have shown that EGF negatively regulates chondrogenesis from chick limb bud mesenchymal cells by inhibiting precartilage condensation and by modulating signaling pathways including those of protein kinase C-{alpha}, Erk-1, and p38 MAPK (77).

D. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating chondrocyte proliferation and maturation
The growth plate functions to produce calcified hypertrophic cartilaginous scaffold for bone deposition. Studies have suggested that EGF-R ligands can regulate postnatal bone growth and bone mass by their direct functions among growth plate chondrocytes. Because chondrocytes in the growth plate express EGF and bear EGF-R (42), EGF-R ligands may directly regulate chondrocyte proliferation and maturation during postnatal bone growth in an autocrine or paracrine manner. In vitro studies have suggested that chondrocytes respond to EGF by increased proliferation (78, 79). Furthermore, a genetic study has demonstrated that in EGF-R null mice, the region of hypertrophic chondrocytes in the growth plate was significantly increased (80), indicating premature differentiation of chondrocytes and suggesting that EGF-R signaling prevents terminal differentiation of chondrocytes. Consistent with the mitogenic effects and differentiation inhibitory effects of EGF-R ligands on chondrocytes, defects in bone lengthening were observed in EGF transgenic mice, which were associated with an expansion of the proliferative zone and a delay in chondrocyte hypertrophic maturation in the growth plate (42).

Interestingly, EGF can augment responsiveness of IGF-I stimulation by increasing the expression of the IGF-I receptor in growth plate chondrocytes (81). Treatment of cultured growth plate chondrocytes with EGF produced an increase in cell surface density of IGF-I receptor and specific binding of IGF-I, resulting in an enhanced protein synthesis, and pretreatment with EGF increased the responsiveness of chondrocytes to IGF-I, resulting in augmentation of IGF-I-stimulated mitotic activity and proteoglycan synthesis (81). Given the important role of IGF-I in bone growth (see Section V) and the presence of EGF and receptor in the growth plate, this in vitro study suggests a role for the interaction between these two growth factors in the regulation of bone lengthening and bone growth.

E. Roles of EGF-R ligands in regulating osteoblast proliferation and maturation
Bone matrix is synthesized by active osteoblasts on bone surface. Within an appropriate signaling environment, committed mesenchymal osteoprogenitor cells in the bone marrow first differentiate into the intermediate preosteoblasts before they mature into bone matrix-synthesizing osteoblasts, and osteoblasts finally become inactive bone-lining osteoblasts or osteocytes embedded in mineralized bone (82, 83, 84). Studies have suggested that growth and development of osteoblasts are regulated by EGF-R ligands. Early studies demonstrated expression of EGF-R in osteoblasts and osteocytes in vivo (85, 86), and recent studies showed that EGF-R and all its ligands are expressed in osteoblastic cells (87). Consistently, EGF and EGF-R were found widely distributed in growing antler, with expression of both molecules identified in osteoblastic cell lineage (including osteoprogenitor cells, osteoblasts, and osteocytes) (88). Functionally, as shown in in vitro studies using osteogenic cell lines (89), EGF-R in osteogenic cells is important in maintaining their proliferation potential and in suppressing osteoblast differentiation. Consistently, EGF (90, 91), and more recently AR and TGF-{alpha} (87), strongly stimulated osteoblastic cell proliferation, and EGF (92, 93) and AR (87) inhibited osteoblast differentiation as they decreased alkaline phosphatase levels and collagen-1 production. Concordant with the mitogenic role, blocking the EGF-R by using specific EGF-R inhibitors significantly inhibited basal DNA synthesis of osteoblastic cells (87). Furthermore, the roles of EGF-R in osteoblastic cells have been confirmed with in vivo genetic studies. In EGF-R null mice and mice humanized for EGF-R, accelerated osteoblast differentiation and hindered osteoblast proliferation were observed, confirming that signaling of EGF-R positively influences bone cell proliferation but negatively regulates their differentiation (80). Consistently, calvarial osteoblasts isolated from these mutant mice proliferated more slowly and displayed an increased differentiation capacity in vitro. Conversely, in EGF transgenic mice, there was an accumulation of irregular osteoblasts along trabecular bone surfaces (42). These in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that EGF-R ligands stimulate proliferation but suppress differentiation of osteoblastic cells.

F. Regulation of EGF-R ligand production by PTH
PTH plays an important role in calcium and phosphate homeostasis and bone remodeling (94, 95, 96). Depending on ways of administration or patterns and duration of PTH elevation in circulation, PTH has two opposite effects on bone. Although continuous administration causes bone loss, intermittent injection increases bone formation and improves trabecular architecture and bone density (95). To date, PTH is the only valid treatment option for osteoporosis and for preventing osteoporosis-induced fractures that works by predominantly promoting bone anabolism (97). PTH stimulates osteoblast accumulation and bone formation possibly via several means. It can promote osteoblast recruitment, maturation, and activity (possibly mediated by increased IGF-I production), increase bone remodeling rate as well as the amount of bone deposited in each remodeling cycle, and/or prevent osteoblasts from undergoing apoptosis (95, 98, 99, 100). Although the "anabolic" effects of PTH require brief exposures to higher than average PTH concentrations, its "catabolic" and bone destruction effects result from continuous infusion or continuous secretion of PTH (as in chronic renal disease and primary hyperparathyroidism) (100). It has been shown that continuous PTH exposure inhibits osteoblast differentiation (101) and results in an increase in expression of the osteoclastogenic cytokine [receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand (RANKL)] with an associated inhibitory effect on expression of osteoclastogenic inhibitor osteoprotegerin (61, 102, 103).

An early study has shown that PTH, in a dose- and time-dependent manner, increased levels of EGF-R mRNA expression, EGF-R numbers, and EGF binding in osteoblast-like UMR 106-01 cells, which was associated with an enhanced biological effect (104, 105, 106), suggesting that effects of PTH on osteoblasts may be mediated indirectly or at least partially by signaling through EGF-R. Consistently, activation of the MAPK ERK1/2 by PTH treatment in differentiating transgenic murine osteoblasts was shown to be mediated by transactivation of EGF-R (107).

More recently, EGF-R ligand AR has been identified to be a general immediate response gene following PTH action in bone. Although expression of EGF-R ligands TGF-{alpha} and BTC was shown to be stimulated by PTH (87), AR has been found to be the major member of the EGF-R ligands that is highly induced and regulated by PTH (108). AR has profound effects on osteoblastogenesis because it strongly stimulates proliferation of preosteoblasts but inhibits their differentiation and mineralization of mature osteoblasts (87). Consistently, AR null mice had significantly less tibial trabecular bone than wild-type mice and displayed an osteoporotic phenotype (87). Similarly, AR expression was also induced by other osteotrophic agents such as the active metabolite of vitamin D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25-(OH)2D3], and prostaglandin E2 (87). These studies suggest an important role for AR in bone development and metabolism and implicate it as the major EGF-R ligand that is regulated by osteotrophic hormones such as PTH in bone (87). Because intermittent PTH mainly functions to facilitate the final differentiation of the osteoblasts and inhibit their apoptosis, thus increasing their bone formation activities, the biological significance of AR production as regulated by PTH remains to be further characterized. However, due to its possible role in controlling osteoblastogenesis (increasing preosteoblast proliferation but inhibiting its maturation), AR could be one of the means for PTH to manipulate the microenvironment in bone to control remodeling (87).

G. Roles of EGF family ligands in regulating osteoclast formation and bone modeling
Bone laid down on the calcified growth plate cartilaginous scaffold at the metaphysis is woven bone, which, through coordinated action of bone synthesis cells (osteoblasts) and resorptive cells (osteoclasts), is to be modeled to become more mature and mechanically sound lamellar bone (Fig. 2BGo) (52). Osteoclasts, produced and activated from the marrow hematopoietic pathway under the influence of osteoclastogenic signals produced by osteoblast lineage cells, bind to the surface of calcified tissues and secrete acid and proteolytic enzymes to undergo resorption and modeling of calcified cartilage or bone (109). It is now known that two hematopoietic factors, namely RANKL and macrophage colony-stimulating factor, together are necessary and sufficient for osteoclast formation (61, 64, 110). Several factors that can modulate osteoclastogenesis have also been identified. Although vitamin D3 active metabolite, PTH, PTHrP, prostaglandin E2, cytokines IL-1, IL-6, TNF-{alpha}, and IL-11, and corticosteroids have been shown to induce the expression of RANKL in stromal/osteoblastic cells and thus stimulate osteoclast formation, osteoprotegerin (also produced by osteoblastic lineage cells and functioning as a decoy receptor for RANKL), blocks the RANKL interaction with its receptor RANK (receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B) and inhibits osteoclastogenesis (61, 64, 110).

It has long been demonstrated that EGF has catabolic effects on bone. In an organ culture study, high concentrations of EGF stimulated bone resorption in fetal rat long bone (111, 112). Administration of EGF at high dose to rats caused an elevation of osteoclastic cell density on trabecular bone surface (113). Consistently, in EGF transgenic mice, thinner bones were observed (42), suggesting an imbalance in bone modeling or remodeling. Evidence has also demonstrated that differentiation and function of osteoclasts are also regulated by EGF-R ligands. An early in vitro study showed that addition of TGF-{alpha} or EGF peptide in the first week of culture followed by treatment with 1,25-(OH)2D3 for 2 wk increased formation of osteoclast-like multinuclear cells from cultured human bone marrow cells (114). Interestingly, further studies showed that, whereas TGF-{alpha} promoted proliferation of osteoclast precursor cells, 1,25-(OH)2D3 increased the rate of precursor cell fusion into osteoclasts and that treatment of these cultures with TGF-{alpha} without later addition of 1,25-(OH)2D3 did not increase osteoclast-like cell formation (114). These findings suggest that TGF-{alpha} and EGF may stimulate bone resorption by increasing the proliferation of osteoclast precursors, which leads to increased numbers of osteoclasts. Consistently, early during tooth eruption, which involves accumulation of mononuclear osteoclast precursor cells in the dental follicle, the apical part of the follicle has been shown to be a site that binds EGF and contains intense cell proliferation, suggesting that EGF may play a role in increasing numbers of mononuclear osteoclast precursor cells for osteoclast differentiation (115, 116).

More recently, it has been shown that EGF-R plays a role in mediating the ability of human bone marrow stromal cells to induce osteoclast differentiation (117, 118). Human primary bone marrow stromal cells and mesenchymal stem cell-like HDS cells were shown to express immunoreactive EGF-R, and treatment of HDS cells with EGF increased EGF-R activation. Interestingly, treatment of HDS cells with EGF-R inhibitor decreased levels of secreted osteoclastogenic factors (macrophage colony-stimulating factor and RANKL) by these cells, and reduced the ability of the conditioned medium from treated HDS cells to sustain the differentiation of preosteoclasts (117). These findings suggest that EGF-R regulates the ability of bone marrow stromal cells to induce osteoclast differentiation.

In addition, mature osteoclasts have been shown to express EGF-R (85), and their resorptive function may be stimulated by locally acting agents such as TGF-{alpha} (119). Furthermore, EGF-R signaling has been shown to be important for secretion of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), enzymes that are important for tissue degradation. Like IL-1a, EGF was shown to be potent in inducing production of MMPs, including gelatinase A (MMP-2) and gelatinase B (MMP-9), and enhanced bone resorption in cultured rabbit calvarial bone explants (120).

Moreover, also possibly through controlling MMP production, EGF-R signaling is necessary for normal craniofacial development because EGF-R null mutation caused facial mediolateral defects in newborn mice, and cultured mandibular processes from EGF-R null embryos had deficient morphogenesis of Meckel’s cartilage (121). Consistent with the ability of exogenous EGF to increase MMP secretion and with the decreased MMP expression after blockage of EGF-R signaling in wild-type explants, the secretion of MMPs was diminished in explants from EGF-R null embryos. These studies suggest that the role of EGF-R signaling for normal craniofacial development is mediated in part by its downstream target, i.e., increased secretion of MMPs (121). Furthermore, EGF, particularly in synergy with cytokine IL-1, increased release of collagenase in soft tissues as shown in periosteal explants from rabbit calvariae, suggesting that concomitant presence of IL-1 and EGF may play a role in collagenase-mediated degradation of collagen (122, 123). The above studies suggest that EGF and related ligands have catabolic effects on bone by influencing the differentiation and activity of osteoclasts as well as through increasing production of MMPs.


    V. Roles of EGF-R Ligands in Regulating Levels of Growth Modulators IGF-I and IGFBP-3
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
It is well known that GH and IGF-I are two major factors regulating postnatal somatic and, particularly, bone growth. The critical role of IGF-I in normal bone growth has been confirmed by the severe growth retardation in null mice lacking IGF-I or its receptor (124, 125), and genetic evidence has suggested that GH has a dual, IGF-I-independent and IGF-I-dependent, role in promoting longitudinal bone growth (70). It is now clear that both circulating and locally expressed IGF-I are important in longitudinal bone growth and the maintenance of bone mass, and IGF-I plays an essential role in longitudinal bone growth in response to GH exposure (126, 127). IGF-I stimulates proliferation of chondrocytes at the proliferative zone of the growth plate (128) and stimulates osteoblast proliferation, matrix protein synthesis, and bone formation (126, 129). Furthermore, skeletal expression of IGF-I is critical for osteoblast differentiation (130).

Studies have suggested that EGF-R ligands may indirectly cause postnatal growth retardation by regulating levels of IGF-I and IGF-I binding proteins (IGFBPs). Systemic treatment with EGF reduced circulating levels of IGF-I in neonatal rats (131, 132) and in adult rats and minipigs (133, 134, 135). The rapid decline in IGF-I concentration after EGF administration, particularly in neonates, implies that changes in IGF-I levels could be involved in mediating EGF-induced growth retardation (131).

IGFBPs carry IGF-I in the circulation or in the local tissue environment. Although the bioactivity of IGF-I in the tissue cellular microenvironment is modulated by both inhibitory and stimulatory IGFBPs, the stability or half-life of IGF-I in the circulation is maintained by IGFBPs, predominantly IGFBP-3. In EGF transgenic mice, as a possible explanation for their stunted growth, serum IGFBP-3 level was found significantly reduced, suggesting a decreased level of circulating IGF-I for skeletal growth (42). Consistently, there was a lowered serum IGFBP-3 level in normal rats that received exogenous EGF injection for 4 wk (133). Similarly, HB-EGF overexpression decreased expression of IGFBP-3 and -4 mRNA, particularly in the kidney, and the transgenic mice exhibited a 20% decrease in weight before 6 wk of age compared with wild-type littermates (43), suggesting that overexpression of HB-EGF affected growth possibly through a pathway involving IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-4. In addition, accompanying growth retardation, EGF administration caused a rapid increase in the serum concentration of inhibitory IGFBP-1 and hepatic IGFBP-1 mRNA levels in newborn rats, suggesting that elevated IGFBP-1 concentrations may restrict IGF bioactivity in the neonatal rat (132).

Since IGF-I and IGFBPs are major endocrine factors that regulate bone growth, the above evidence suggests that EGF-R ligands may indirectly regulate postnatal growth by their effects on the IGF-I and IGFBP levels in the circulation. However, because both IGF-I and IGFBPs are expressed in growth plate chondrocytes and osteoblasts (136, 137, 138), and because the locally expressed IGF-I and IGFBPs are also important in regulating bone growth (126), it will be interesting to find out whether EGF-R ligand treatment or overexpression would modulate expression levels of IGF-I or IGFBPs in the growth plate and metaphyseal bone, the two regions that make up the active bone "growth unit." Recently, in vitro studies showed that IGF-I modulates its activity in cultured rat growth plate chondrocytes by modulating the synthesis of IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-5 (139), and IGFBP-5 has been shown to potentiate chondrocyte differentiation (138). To investigate potential interaction of EGF-R ligands and IGF-I on bone growth, it would be interesting to investigate any potential regulation of levels of both stimulatory (e.g., IGFBP-5) and inhibitory IGFBPs (e.g., IGFBP-4) (136, 137) in the growth plate or bone in vivo by EGF-R ligands. IGFBP-3 has recently been identified as an EGF-R downstream target molecule in primary and immortalized human esophageal epithelial cells to regulate bioavailability of free IGF-I for growth of these cells through EGF activation of EGF-R and MAPK (140), and IGFBP-3 has been shown to have IGF-independent growth inhibitory effects in chondroprogenitor cells inducing their apoptosis and antagonizing TGF-ß chondroinductive effects (141, 142). Therefore, it would also be interesting to find out whether IGFBP-3 could be a downstream target molecule of EGF-R signaling in growth plate chondrocytes, bone cells, or bone marrow mesenchymal cells.


    VI. Roles of EGF-R Ligands in Biology of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
Pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the bone marrow stroma give rise to osteoblastic precursors (osteoprogenitor cells) in addition to precursor cells for adipocytes, muscle cells, chondrocytes, and endothelial cells and are important in maintaining bone homeostasis and regeneration (143, 144). Human primary bone marrow stromal cells and MSCs express EGF-R (117, 145), and MSC-like HDS cells express immunoreactive EGF-R and respond to EGF with an elevated level of EGF-R activation (117). Functionally, studies suggest that EGF-R ligands can regulate MSC proliferation and differentiation. MSCs can proliferate and form colonies to give rise to colony-forming unit fibroblasts in a serum-free medium in the presence of EGF (143). Through activating EGF-R, ERK, and protein kinase B/akt, EGF stimulated motility and proliferation of human bone marrow MSCs; however, it did not modify their differentiation potential into adipogenic or osteogenic lineages (146). Similarly, HB-EGF stimulated MSC ex vivo proliferation without inducing spontaneous differentiation, and interestingly, HB-EGF reversibly prevented adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation from MSCs induced by specific differentiation culture conditions, maintaining their self-renewal divisions (147). In addition, AR and TGF-{alpha} have been shown to stimulate growth of primary bone marrow stromal cells (148, 149). Although the in vivo role of EGF-R expression by MSCs is not clear, the above studies have demonstrated that the primary bone marrow stromal cells or MSCs can proliferate, maintain their self-renewal potential, and prevent their multilineage differentiation ex vivo in response to EGF-like ligands. These studies suggest that EGF-R ligands (such as EGF, TGF-{alpha}, and HB-EGF) could be used as mitogens for ex vivo expansion of bone marrow MSCs for the purposes of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (144, 146). Interestingly, a recent study has shown that there was a greater growth factor production (including EGF) by bone marrow stromal cells in response to exposure to wound microenvionment, suggesting that bone marrow stromal cells themselves might augment wound healing through the responsive secretion of growth factors (including EGF) (150).

Although the above studies suggest that EGF-R and ligands are relevant to biology of bone marrow MSCs, further studies are required to investigate the sources of EGF-R ligands in the bone marrow and whether the EGF-R signaling indeed contributes to maintain a broad, proliferating pool of undifferentiated MSCs in vivo. Interestingly, an ex vivo study has shown that, compared with healthy controls, cultured bone marrow stromal cells from lung and breast cancer patients were found to have a diminished percentage of cells expressing growth factor receptors including EGF-R, and such alterations could help to explain a deficient cloning capacity of the bone marrow MSCs, an inefficient confluence capacity of bone marrow stromal cells, and a lower content of colony-forming unit fibroblasts in the bone marrow of these cancer patients (151, 152). These findings suggest that EGF-R ligands may have a role in regulating the MSC pool in the bone marrow in vivo.


    VII. Concluding Remarks
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 
Gene expression, pharmacological, and genetic studies have suggested or/and demonstrated that the EGF family of growth factors plays a role in regulating postnatal somatic growth, and that EGF-R ligands can regulate postnatal somatic growth by several means (Fig. 3Go). Although optimal levels of both milk-borne and endogenous EGF-R ligands are important for ensuring optimal maternal milk supply for neonates and supporting postnatal somatic growth by regulating growth and maturation of the gastrointestinal tract, supraphysiological levels of EGF-R ligands induce retarded and disproportionate growth and alter body composition because they can increase epithelial tissue growth but decrease muscle, fat, and bone proportions. Although EGF-R signaling can indirectly cause growth retardation by negatively regulating levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3, EGF-R ligands can also directly regulate bone growth and modeling. EGF-R signaling promotes proliferation but prohibits differentiation or maturation of growth plate chondrocytes and metaphyseal bone osteoblasts, and EGF-R ligands also promote formation and function of bone resorptive osteoclasts. Therefore, through controlling these three types of bone cells, EGF-R ligands act to allow proper development of long bones with appropriate bone mass accumulation and trabecular organization attainment. In addition, EGF-R signaling also appears to regulate bone homeostasis and regeneration potential by promoting proliferation but suppressing differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.


Figure 3
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
FIG. 3. Several possible indirect and direct ways in which ligands of the EGF-R can regulate postnatal somatic growth.

 
Additional studies are needed to evaluate roles of the EGF family of growth factors in regulating postnatal growth and body composition. In particular, more in vivo studies will be needed to investigate potential synergistic or inhibitory interactions and their mechanisms between EGF-R ligands and other important growth regulatory factors (such as IGF-I, IGFBPs, PTH, and sex hormones). For example, whereas PTH has been shown to influence expression of EGF-like ligands (particularly AR) strongly, the biological significance of this regulation remains to be investigated. In addition, whereas EGF-R ligands can stimulate proliferation but prevent differentiation of bone marrow MSCs ex vivo, their in vivo role in bone marrow MSC biology remains to be investigated. Due to the potential compensatory redundancy among members of the EGF family, analysis of roles and action mechanisms of EGF-R would be more informative with mutant mice with multiple member gene knockout (such as EGF-AR-TGF-{alpha} triple null) or receptor mutant mice.


    Acknowledgments
 
The author thanks Dr. B. K. Foster (Women’s and Children’s Hospital, South Australia), Dr. L. C. Read (TGR Biosicence, South Australia), and Prof. D. C. Lee (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) for valuable discussion and support.


    Footnotes
 
Work from the author’s laboratory was supported in part by the Bone Growth Foundation (Australia) and project grants and fellowship from the Australia National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). For writing this review, grant or fellowship support was received from NHMRC RD Wright Fellowship (Australia).

Disclosure Statement: The author has nothing to disclose.

First Published Online February 23, 2007

Abbreviations: AR, Amphiregulin; BTC, betacellulin; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGF-R, EGF receptor; EPR, epiregulin; HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth factor; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; MMPs, matrix metalloproteases; MSCs, mesenchymal stem cells; 1,25(OH)2D3, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3; RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear factor-{kappa}B ligand.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 I. Introduction
 II. EGF Family of...
 III. Roles of EGF...
 IV. Roles of EGF...
 V. Roles of EGF-R...
 VI. Roles of EGF-R...
 VII. Concluding Remarks
 References
 

  1. Lee DC, Fenton SE, Berkowitz EA, Hissong MA 1995 Transforming growth factor {alpha}: expression, regulation, and biological activities. Pharmacol Rev 47:51–85[Medline]
  2. Pinkas-Kramarski R, Alroy I, Yarden Y 1997 ErbB receptors and EGF-like ligands: cell lineage determination and oncogenesis through combinatorial signaling. J Mamm Gland Biol Neoplasia 2:97–107[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Gassmann M, Lemke G 1997 Neuregulins and neuregulin receptors in neural development. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:87–92[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Mirsky R, Jessen KR 1999 The neurobiology of Schwann cells. Brain Pathol 9:293–311[Medline]
  5. Vartanian T, Fischbach G, Miller R 1999 Failure of spinal cord oligodendrocyte development in mice lacking neuregulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:731–735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Esper RM, Pankonin MS, Loeb JA 2006 Neuregulins: versatile growth and differentiation factors in nervous system development and human disease. Brain Res Rev 51:161–175[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Prigent SA, Lemoine NR 1992 The type 1 (EGFR-related) family of growth factor receptors and their ligands. Prog Growth Factor Res 4:1–24[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Carpenter CD, Ingraham HA, Cochet C, Walton GM, Lazar CS, Sowadski JM, Rosenfeld MG, Gill GN 1991 Structural analysis of the transmembrane domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Biol Chem 266:5750–5755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Tzahar E, Pinkas-Kramarski R, Moyer JD, Klapper LN, Alroy I, Levkowitz G, Shelly M, Henis S, Eisenstein M, Ratzkin BJ, Sela M, Andrews GC, Yarden Y 1997 Bivalence of EGF-like ligands drives the ErbB signaling network. EMBO J 16:4938–4950[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Carpenter G 2000 The EGF receptor: a nexus for trafficking and signaling. Bioessays 22:697–707[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Sweeney C, Carraway 3rd KL 2000 Ligand discrimination by ErbB receptors: differential signaling through differential phosphorylation site usage. Oncogene 19:5568–5573[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Burgering BM, Coffer PJ 1995 Protein kinase B (c-Akt) in phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase signal transduction. Nature 376:599–602[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Alroy I, Yarden Y 1997 The ErbB signaling network in embryogenesis and oncogenesis: signal diversification through combinatorial ligand-receptor interactions. FEBS Lett 410:83–86[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Silberstein GB 2001 Postnatal mammary gland morphogenesis. Microsc Res Tech 52:155–162[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Xian CJ, Zhou X-F 2000 Roles of transforming growth factor-{alpha} and related molecules in the nervous system. Mol Neurobiol 20:157–183
  16. Xian CJ, Zhou XF 2004 EGF family of growth factors: essential roles and functional redundancy in the nerve system. Front Biosci 9:85–92[Medline]
  17. Barnard JA, Beauchamp RD, Russell WE, Dubois RN, Coffey RJ 1995 Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their relevance to gastrointestinal pathophysiology. Gastroenterology 108:564–580[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Dignass AU, Sturm A 2001 Peptide growth factors in the intestine. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 13:763–770[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Xian CJ, Cool JC, Howarth GS, Read LC 2002 Effects of TGF-{alpha} gene knockout on epithelial cell kinetics and repair of methotrexate-induced damage in mouse small intestine. J Cell Physiol 191:105–115[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Xian CJ 2003 Roles of growth factors in chemotherapy-induced intestinal mucosal damage repair. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 4:260–269[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Lonnerdal B 2003 Nutritional and physiologic significance of human milk proteins. Am J Clin Nutr 77:1537S–1543S
  22. Schroeder JA, Lee DC 1998 Dynamic expression and activation of ERBB receptors in the developing mouse mammary gland. Cell Growth Differ 9:451–464[Abstract]
  23. Luetteke NC, Qiu TH, Fenton SE, Troyer KL, Riedel RF, Chang A, Lee DC 1999 Targeted inactivation of the EGF and amphiregulin genes reveals distinct roles for EGF receptor ligands in mouse mammary gland development. Development 126:2739–2750[Abstract]
  24. Schroeder JA, Troyer KL, Lee DC 2000 Cooperative induction of mammary tumorigenesis by TGF-{alpha} and Wnts. Oncogene 19:3193–3199[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Troyer KL, Lee DC 2001 Regulation of mouse mammary gland development and tumorigenesis by the ERBB signaling network. J Mamm Gland Biol Neoplasia 6:7–21[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Kenney NJ, Bowman A, Korach KS, Barrett JC, Salomon DS 2003 Effect of exogenous epidermal-like growth factors on mammary gland development and differentiation in the estrogen receptor-{alpha} knockout (ERKO) mouse. Breast Cancer Res Treat 79:161–173[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Carraway KL, Price-Schiavi SA, Komatsu M, Idris N, Perez A, Li P, Jepson S, Zhu X, Carvajal ME, Carraway CA 2000 Multiple facets of sialomucin complex/MUC4, a membrane mucin and erbb2 ligand, in tumors and tissues (Y2K update). Front Biosci 5:D95–D107
  28. Price-Schiavi SA, Andrechek E, Idris N, Li P, Rong M, Zhang J, Carothers Carraway CA, Muller WJ, Carraway KL 2005 Expression, location, and interactions of ErbB2 and its intramembrane ligand Muc4 (sialomucin complex) in rat mammary gland during pregnancy. J Cell Physiol 203:44–53[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Kajikawa K, Yasui W, Sumiyoshi H, Yoshida K, Nakayama H, Ayhan A, Yokozaki H, Ito H, Tahara E 1991 Expression of epidermal growth factor in human tissues. Immunohistochemical and biochemical analysis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 418:27–32[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Sheffield LG 1990 Effect of sialoadenectomy on the ability of mouse serum to induce deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in mammary epithelial cells: possible role of epidermal growth factor. J Dairy Sci 73:2087–2092[Abstract]
  31. Okamoto S, Oka T 1984 Evidence for physiological function of epidermal growth factor: pregestational sialoadenectomy of mice decreases milk production and increases offspring mortality during lactation period. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:6059–6063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Sheffield LG, Welsch CW 1987 Influence of submandibular salivary glands on hormone responsiveness of mouse mammary glands. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 186:368–377[Abstract]
  33. Miettinen PJ, Berger JE, Meneses J, Phung Y, Pedersen RA, Werb Z, Derynck R 1995 Epithelial immaturity and multiorgan failure in mice lacking epidermal growth factor receptor. Nature 376:337–341[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Threadgill DW, Dlugosz AA, Hansen LA, Tennenbaum T, Lichti U, Yee D, LaMantia C, Mourton T, Herrup K, Harris RC, Barnard JA, Yuspa SH, Coffey RJ, Magnuson T 1995 Targeted disruption of mouse EGF receptor: effect of genetic background on mutant phenotype. Science 269:230–234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Sibilia M, Steinbach JP, Stingl L, Aguzzi A, Wagner EF 1998 A strain-independent postnatal neurodegeneration in mice lacking the EGF receptor. EMBO J 17:719–731[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Luetteke NC, Qiu TH, Peiffer RL, Oliver P, Smithies O, Lee DC 1993 TGF-{alpha} deficiency results in hair follicle and eye abnormalities in targeted and waved-1 mice. Cell 73:263–278[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Schneider MR, Dahlhoff M, Herbach N, Renner-Mueller I, Dalke C, Puk O, Graw J, Wanke R, Wolf E 2005 Betacellulin overexpression in transgenic mice causes disproportionate growth, pulmonary hemorrhage syndrome, and complex eye pathology. Endocrinology 146:5237–5246[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Troyer KL, Luetteke NC, Saxon ML, Qiu TH, Xian CJ, Lee DC 2001 Growth retardation, duodenal lesions, and aberrant ileum architecture in triple null mice lacking EGF, amphiregulin, and TGF-{alpha}. Gastroenterology 121:68–78[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Hoath SB 1986 Treatment of the neonatal rat with epidermal growth factor: differences in time and organ response. Pediatr Res 20:468–472[Medline]
  40. Hoath SB, Pickens WL, Donnelly MM 1988 Epidermal growth factor-induced growth retardation in the newborn rat: quantitation and relation to changes in skin temperature and viscoelasticity. Growth Dev Aging 52:77–83[Medline]
  41. Webber EM, Wu JC, Wang L, Merlino G, Fausto N 1994 Overexpression of transforming growth factor-{alpha} causes liver enlargement and increased hepatocyte proliferation in transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 145:398–408[Abstract]
  42. Chan SY, Wong RW 2000 Expression of epidermal growth factor in transgenic mice causes growth retardation. J Biol Chem 275:38693–38698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Provenzano AP, Besner GE, James PF, Harding PA 2005 Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) overexpression in transgenic mice downregulates insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3 and -4 mRNA. Growth Factors 23:19–31[Medline]
  44. Veldhuis JD, Roemmich JN, Richmond EJ, Rogol AD, Lovejoy JC, Sheffield-Moore M, Mauras N, Bowers CY 2005 Endocrine control of body composition in infancy, childhood, and puberty. Endocr Rev 26:114–146[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Serrero G, Mills D 1991 Physiological role of epidermal growth factor on adipose tissue development in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3912–3916[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Howarth GS, Bastian SE, Dunbar AJ, Goddard C 2003 Betacellulin promotes growth of the gastrointestinal organs and effects a diuresis in normal rats. Growth Factors 21:79–86[CrossRef][Medline]
  47. Sandgren EP, Luetteke NC, Palmiter RD, Brinster RL, Lee DC 1990 Overexpression of TGF-{alpha} in transgenic mice: induction of epithelial hyperplasia, pancreatic metaplasia, and carcinoma of the breast. Cell 61:1121–1135[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Pedersen SB, Kristensen K, Bruun JM, Flyvbjerg A, Vinter-Jensen L, Richelsen B 2000 Systemic administration of epidermal growth factor increases UCP3 mRNA levels in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 279:914–919[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Kristensen K, Pedersen SB, Vinter-Jensen L, Flyvbjerg A, Richelsen B 1998 Systemic administration of epidermal growth factor reduces fat mass in rats: effects on the hormone-sensitive-lipase, lipoprotein lipase and leptin. Horm Res 50:292–296[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Ianotti JP 1990 Growth plate physiology and pathology. Orthop Clin N Am 21:1–17[Medline]
  51. Karsenty G, Wagner EF 2002 Reaching a genetic and molecular understanding of skeletal development. Dev Cell 2:389–406[CrossRef][Medline]
  52. Xian CJ, Foster BK 2006 The biologic aspects of children’s fractures. In: Beaty J, Kasser J, eds. Fractures in children. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 21–50
  53. van der Eerden BC, Karperien M, Wit JM 2003 Systemic and local regulation of the growth plate. Endocr Rev 24:782–801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Price JS, Oyajobi BO, Russell RG 1994 The cell biology of bone growth. Eur J Clin Nutr 48(Suppl 1):S131—S149
  55. Daughaday WH, Hall K, Raben MS, Salmon Jr WD, van den Brande JL, van Wyk JJ 1972 Somatomedin: proposed designation for sulphation factor. Nature 235:107[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Vortkamp A, Lee K, Lanske B, Segre GV, Kronenberg HM, Tabin CJ 1996 Regulation of rate of cartilage differentiation by Indian hedgehog and PTH-related protein. Science 273:613–622[Abstract]
  57. Rousseau F, Bonaventure J, Legeai-Mallet L, Pelet A, Rozet JM, Maroteaux P, Le Merrer M, Munnich A 1996 Mutations of the fibroblast growth factor receptor-3 gene in achondroplasia. Horm Res 45:108–110[Medline]
  58. Mancilla EE, De Luca F, Uyeda JA, Czerwiec FS, Baron J 1998 Effects of fibroblast growth factor-2 on longitudinal bone growth. Endocrinology 139:2900–2904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ 1999 Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev 20:345–357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Gerber H-P, Vu TH, Ryan AM, Kowalski J, Werb Z, Ferrara N 1999 VEGF couples hypertrophic cartilage remodeling, ossification and angiogenesis during endochondral bone formation. Nat Med 5:623–628[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL 2003 Osteoclast differentia