help button home button Endocrine Society Endocrine Reviews
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

First published online on January 24, 2006
Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2005-0015
Endocrine Reviews, doi:10.1210/er.2005-0015
Endocrine Reviews 0 (2006): 200500151-
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
27/2/170    most recent
Final Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macklon, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C.J.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macklon, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fauser, B. C.J.M.

The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for IVF

Nick S. Macklon*, Richard L. Stouffer, Linda C. Giudice, and Bart C.J.M. Fauser

Nick S. Macklon Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.; Richard L. Stouffer Division of Reproductive Sciences, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Oregon, USA.; Linda C. Giudice Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA; Bart C.J.M. Fauser Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: n.s.macklon{at}umcutrecht.nl.

To allow selection of embryos for transfer following in vitro fertilization, ovarian stimulation is usually carried out with exogenous gonadotropins. To compensate for changes induced by stimulation, GnRH analog co-treatment, oral contraceptive pre-treatment, late follicular phase hCG and luteal phase progesterone supplementation are usually added. These approaches render ovarian stimulation complex and costly. The stimulation of multiple follicular development disrupts the physiology of follicular development, with consequences for the oocyte, embryo and endometrium. In recent years, recombinant gonadotropin preparations have become available, and novel stimulation protocols with less detrimental effects have been developed. In this article, the scientific background to current approaches to ovarian stimulation for IVF is reviewed. Following a brief discussion of relevant aspect of ovarian physiology, the development, application and consequences of ovarian stimulation strategies are reviewed in detail.

Contents

I. Introduction

II. Physiology of ovarian function relevant to ovarian stimulation

A. Endocrine control of follicular development

B. Intra-ovarian modulators of steroidogenesis

C. Control of corpus luteum function

D. Control of endometrial function

E. Ovarian aging

III. The development of ovarian stimulation agents

A. Background

B. The discovery of Clomiphene Citrate

C. Gonadotropins

D. GnRH agonists

E. GnRH antagonists

IV. Ovarian stimulation regimens

A. Clomiphene Citrate

B. Gonadotropins

C. The role of LH

D. GnRH agonists

E. GnRH antagonists

V. Adjuvant therapies

A. Oral contraceptive pre-treatment

B. Insulin sensitizing agents

C. Aromatase Inhibitors

D. Growth Hormone

E. Androgens

VI. Sequelae of ovarian stimulation

A. Effects on corpus luteum function

B. Effects on endometrial receptivity

C. Effects on embryo quality

D. Side effects and complications

VII. Contemporary issues in ovarian stimulation

A. Poor response to ovarian stimulation

B. Minimal vs. maximal ovarian stimulation

C. HCG substitutes for inducing final oocyte maturation

D. Chromosomal competence of embryos

VIII. Conclusions and future perspectives


Key words: follicle development • ovarian stimulation • IVF • gonadotropins • outcomes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. C. Boxmeer, R. P.M. Steegers-Theunissen, J. Lindemans, M. F. Wildhagen, E. Martini, E. A.P. Steegers, and N. S. Macklon
Homocysteine metabolism in the pre-ovulatory follicle during ovarian stimulation
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2570 - 2576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, F.J. Broekmans, C. de Klerk, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and N.S. Macklon
Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2050 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
N. S. Macklon, M. H. van der Gaast, A. Hamilton, B. C. J. M. Fauser, and L. C. Giudice
The Impact of Ovarian Stimulation With Recombinant FSH in Combination With GnRH Antagonist on the Endometrial Transcriptome in the Window of Implantation
Reproductive Sciences, April 1, 2008; 15(4): 357 - 365.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Y.-L. Lee, Y. Liu, P.-Y. Ng, K.-F. Lee, C.-L. Au, E. H.-Y. Ng, P.-C. Ho, and W. S.-B. Yeung
Aberrant expression of angiopoietins-1 and -2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A in peri-implantation endometrium after gonadotrophin stimulation
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 894 - 903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Polinder, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, N.S. Macklon, J.D.F. Habbema, B.J.C.M. Fauser, and M.J.C. Eijkemans
Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 316 - 323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Nargund, B.C.J.M. Fauser, N.S. Macklon, W. Ombelet, K. Nygren, R. Frydman, and for the Rotterdam ISMAAR Consensus Group on Termin
The ISMAAR proposal on terminology for ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2801 - 2804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. McTavish, M. Jimenez, K. A. Walters, J. Spaliviero, N. P. Groome, A. P. Themmen, J. A. Visser, D. J. Handelsman, and C. M. Allan
Rising Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels with Age Accelerate Female Reproductive Failure
Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4432 - 4439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. W. Szkudlinski
Challenges and Opportunities of Trapping Ligands
Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2007; 72(2): 231 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. B. Baart, E. Martini, M. J. Eijkemans, D. Van Opstal, N. G.M. Beckers, A. Verhoeff, N. S. Macklon, and B. C.J.M. Fauser
Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 980 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society